The limitations of micro surveillance cameras in terms of range and resolution are primarily due to their small size and limited technology.
In terms of range, micro surveillance cameras typically have a shorter distance capability compared to larger cameras. This is because they have smaller lenses and sensors, which can limit the clarity and detail of images captured at long distances. Additionally, the signal transmission range of micro cameras may also be limited, affecting the ability to transmit images over a significant distance.
Regarding resolution, the small size of micro surveillance cameras often results in lower image quality compared to larger cameras. This is because they have fewer pixels and a smaller sensor size, which can impact the sharpness and clarity of the captured footage. As a result, micro cameras may struggle to provide high-definition images and details, especially in low-light conditions or when capturing fast-moving subjects.
Overall, while micro surveillance cameras are beneficial for their discreet size and portability, their limitations in range and resolution can impact their effectiveness in certain surveillance scenarios. It is important to consider these factors when selecting a camera for specific surveillance needs.